Brand review | Business Helper AI

Inputs and purpose

Use this workflow to prepare: Brand consistency findings and rewritten passages.

Start with: Draft content and brand/style guide.

Use supplied text or local files the user authorized you to read. If files cannot be opened, request the relevant pasted text. Ask one focused question when missing information changes the next decision. Treat blank template fields as unknown; do not invent business facts.

Procedure

Read the approved voice, audience, factual claims and style requirements alongside the draft.
Identify specific inconsistencies in language, promise, positioning or presentation, explaining their effect on the intended reader.
Revise affected passages while preserving the original business meaning and evidence limits.
Return an edited draft and a concise rationale. Check that stylistic improvements did not introduce unsupported claims or commitments.

Deliverable

Return the requested result in Markdown unless another supported format was requested. Include the evidence or source-record references, material assumptions, open questions and next useful action. Keep unnecessary personal details out of reusable templates; role labels and neutral record identifiers usually suffice.

Business value: Improve messaging and campaign choices.

Possible success measures: Qualified inquiries, conversion, contribution after advertising. Choose the measure that fits the owner's actual goal; it is not a promised result.

Execution and verification

This file is usable as instructions without a named application, account or plugin. Computation, file saving and external actions require actual host capabilities. Use a suitable existing tool for calculations that cannot be checked reliably in conversation.

Distinguish drafts and recommendations from completed actions. Respect existing authorization and do not claim that data was fetched, messages sent or records changed without evidence. Show what was checked and what remains uncertain.

When useful, consult the input guide, calculation reference or output template. For tool setup, use the shared instructions.

Plain-text instructions

---
name: brand-review
description: "Prepare brand consistency findings and rewritten passages. Use for this workflow with supplied business information."
---

# Brand review

## Inputs and purpose

Use this workflow to prepare: Brand consistency findings and rewritten passages.

Start with: Draft content and brand/style guide.

Use supplied text or local files the user authorized you to read. If files cannot be opened, request the relevant pasted text. Ask one focused question when missing information changes the next decision. Treat blank template fields as unknown; do not invent business facts.

## Procedure

1. Read the approved voice, audience, factual claims and style requirements alongside the draft.

2. Identify specific inconsistencies in language, promise, positioning or presentation, explaining their effect on the intended reader.

3. Revise affected passages while preserving the original business meaning and evidence limits.

4. Return an edited draft and a concise rationale. Check that stylistic improvements did not introduce unsupported claims or commitments.

## Deliverable

Return the requested result in Markdown unless another supported format was requested. Include the evidence or source-record references, material assumptions, open questions and next useful action. Keep unnecessary personal details out of reusable templates; role labels and neutral record identifiers usually suffice.

Business value: Improve messaging and campaign choices.

Possible success measures: Qualified inquiries, conversion, contribution after advertising. Choose the measure that fits the owner's actual goal; it is not a promised result.

## Execution and verification

This file is usable as instructions without a named application, account or plugin. Computation, file saving and external actions require actual host capabilities. Use a suitable existing tool for calculations that cannot be checked reliably in conversation.

Distinguish drafts and recommendations from completed actions. Respect existing authorization and do not claim that data was fetched, messages sent or records changed without evidence. Show what was checked and what remains uncertain.

When useful, consult the [input guide](../../../references/INPUT_DATA_GUIDE.md), [calculation reference](../../../references/CALCULATIONS.md) or [output template](../../../references/WORKFLOW_OUTPUT_TEMPLATE.md). For tool setup, use the [shared instructions](../../../AGENTS.md).