---
name: confidentiality-review
description: "Prepare nDA issue classification and review priorities. Use for this workflow with supplied business information."
---

# Confidentiality review

## Inputs and purpose

Use this workflow to prepare: NDA issue classification and review priorities.

Start with: NDA text and approved company positions.

Use supplied text or local files the user authorized you to read. If files cannot be opened, request the relevant pasted text. Ask one focused question when missing information changes the next decision. Treat blank template fields as unknown; do not invent business facts.

## Procedure

1. Identify the purpose of disclosure, parties by role, information involved and approved confidentiality positions.

2. Examine scope, exclusions, permitted recipients, duration, return or deletion duties, compelled disclosure and restrictions beyond confidentiality.

3. Flag terms that conflict with the business purpose or require specialist interpretation. Keep recommendations tied to the supplied text.

4. Return prioritized questions and proposed negotiation positions. Check that confidential material is not reproduced unnecessarily in the review.

## Deliverable

Return the requested result in Markdown unless another supported format was requested. Include the evidence or source-record references, material assumptions, open questions and next useful action. Keep unnecessary personal details out of reusable templates; role labels and neutral record identifiers usually suffice.

Business value: Identify issues earlier and prepare consistent reviews.

Possible success measures: Review turnaround, unresolved exceptions, evidence completeness. Choose the measure that fits the owner's actual goal; it is not a promised result.

## Execution and verification

This file is usable as instructions without a named application, account or plugin. Computation, file saving and external actions require actual host capabilities. Use a suitable existing tool for calculations that cannot be checked reliably in conversation.

Distinguish drafts and recommendations from completed actions. Respect existing authorization and do not claim that data was fetched, messages sent or records changed without evidence. Show what was checked and what remains uncertain.

When useful, consult the [input guide](../../../references/INPUT_DATA_GUIDE.md), [calculation reference](../../../references/CALCULATIONS.md) or [output template](../../../references/WORKFLOW_OUTPUT_TEMPLATE.md). For tool setup, use the [shared instructions](../../../AGENTS.md).